Saturday, March 17, 2012

oh dear

hi there

well, after everyone said what a good idea it was i took my car in for a service about a month ago. in fairness it had been running fine after that. this, however, came to an abrupt end yesterday morning!




the radiator and something called the head gasket decided between themselves to blow yesterday morning. interestingly, they did so during peak hour traffic on what i am informed is the busiest highway in the whole of Africa. it did so when the highway was down to two lanes too. fortunately i was able to get it over to the side of the road and cause no further delay to the massive traffic jam that was already in place!

it shall probably be a good week or so before i get the chariot back, which is annoying as that means i have no way of getting to work or collecting the boys! i will do my best to let you know when it is on the streets again!


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thursday, March 15, 2012

The Stone Roses - support act speculation

hi there

well, as we move ever closer to the return of The Stone Roses, one or two things remain a mystery. the first, and the one i want to know more of, is exactly what they are going to be releasing in the way of new material. late in 2011 they announced they'd signed two record deals, but there's not been a hint of any new material as yet. the now legendary press conference announcing their return suggested at some new songs being "almost ready"; one would have thought they'd be wanting something out before their run of festival appearances and Heaton Park gigs.

in regards of the latter point there, the bigger point of interest for the world at large would be who, if anyone, will be the support act or acts for the band at the Heaton Park weekend. i've got no inside information whatsoever, but the usual reliable sources are presenting a possible four acts. i doubt, as will be obvious from the below, all four will be on the bill. here, then, for your entertainment are the four candidates being presented.

Primal Scream

the links between The Stone Roses and Primal Scream are fascinating. the album The Stone Roses gave many bands a sense of purpose and direction, the absolute best of which was the Scream and the subsequent Screamadelica album. when the wheels fell off The Stone Roses in the 90s, the only instant good which came from it was Mani joining Primal Scream, and the saddest part of the reunion is that Mani is out of that band for good, according to Bobby Gillespie.




the parting of the ways, though final, was rather amicable. who knows, perhaps part of the "buy back" option for Mani returning to The Stone Roses was the guarantee of a support slot for one or more of the gigs. this rumour seems rather plausible, to be honest. right kind of music and same kind of fans. let there be no surprise if they are announced as being on the bill.

Happy Mondays

erm, yes. this one is from a "reliable source" so long as your definition of reliable stretches to Shaun William Ryder. for many it does not; for me it does. "there's always some truth in anything Shaun says" stated Ian Brown, after all. the Mondays are back together and are touring in May, leaving June open just in case, in their words, "The Stone Roses want us to come and be on the bill". was this them angling for the gig or Shaun Ryder just telling it like it is?




a myth from the Madchester scene was that, induced by the ecstacy revolution, all these Manchester bands were the best of mates and all got on fine. the truth was far from this, but there was a friendship of sorts between the Mondays and the Roses from the start, one that went from "of sorts" to "good" as the years went by. for us humble fans, the Happy Mondays and The Stone Roses on the same bill equals heaven. it might well run the risk of turning the whole thing into an early 90s revival festival, though, in particular if the Scream are on the same bill and just do Screamadelica . Shaun Ryder and Bez wish for them to be on the bill, and my understanding is that they are rather persuasive.

Beady Eye

"support them? i'd f*****g sell hot dogs for 'em, if that's what they asked me to do". so said one Liam Gallagher when asked if he would consider an offer to support The Stone Roses. the idea of Liam Gallagher giving up top billing is an interesting one, but when it comes to this there is no surprise. in general, Liam Gallagher is the most self-assured, arrogant and full of himself being on the planet. mention The Stone Roses, however, and just like all of us touched by the magic of the band his head bows and he speaks in terms of awe, reverence and worship.




the band are all mates with Liam, with John Squire in particular being pretty close - Liam's first ever go at lyrics, remember, appeared on Squire's Seahorses album rather than on an Oasis one. if one wanted to see Liam Gallagher give the performance of a lifetime then handing him a stage and telling him he's to get the crowd ready for The Stone Roses would pretty much deliver that.

Beady Eye makes great sense for the bill, but that depends on negotiations and deals around the last act to be touted as support......

Noel Gallagher's High Flying Birds

the idea of the return of The Stone Roses bringing about a sense of universal love, forgiveness and a return of one generation under the same groove probably hits a brick wall in having both Liam and Noel on the same bill. outside of suggestions of legal action by Liam against Noel, i just don't see it happening. a pity, as both love the band and would no doubt want to be involved, but is that enough for them to put differences aside?




if it had to be one or the other, my hope would be that Beady Eye are on the support instead of Noel. the High Flying Birds album, whilst not entirely bad, is just not the sort of thing that would work at all well on a weekend like this one. as is the case with Liam, the band remain friends with Noel so there may be a sense of obligation to invite him along. i kind of hope not.

make of the speculation what you will. if i were to court an opinion, for the sake of politics with the Gallaghers it would be wiser to ask neither than just one of them, so i would expect the Happy Mondays and/or Primal Scream to be announced as the support.

in the end, it does not really matter who is the support act, really. great if we get to see another legendary band, but let's be honest - both us fans and any support act booked are only in Heaton Park for one reason - to see, enjoy and pay homage to The Stone Roses.


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Future Is Medieval

hi there

just a quick heads up, my cousin Andrew has gone and started his own blog. you can access it via clicking the title of this post or if you so wish clicking these very words.

sorry, no pictures with this as he has not added any pictures as such. he does, it has to be said, use capital letters properly in his posts. i don't, but then i always really, really liked how the poster for the silence of the lambs looks.

please have a look at his blog and give him some support!

be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!

the return of name and shame, sadly

Hi there

earlier this year i did promise to expose, indeed name and shame, people that disrupted traffic out of sheer incompetence and an apparent lack of care for other users of the road. thus far it has been, surprisingly and happily, not something i have had to do much of. we do, alas, have one culprit today.

thank you for nothing, PCJ Haulage.




the clown, for as you will read there can be no other practical term for them, driving this truck was spluttering and stalling at the bottom of the incline. this little fact did not stop him attempting to go further up where, much to his surprise no doubt, the truck came to a standstill. as did the traffic behind.

not content with this stupidity, the driver then tried what can only be described as a "jiggle" to get it all working and, albeit briefly, blocked off both lanes as a consequence.




PCJ Haulage do not appear to have an internet web address thing - not really a surprise i suppose, if they cannot master basic driving then one must assume that such techonology as the internet exceeds their grasp. i am then hopeful that random google searches and similar will lead anyone wanting to know of them here and you can decide what sort of company they are.


try not to be this ignorant on the road, and do be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Sunday at school

hi there

last Sunday saw us head off to school, but not as such for what one would call Sunday School. James' school was holding a fundraising fun day and, needless to say, of course we went along. well, not just us, but you shall see.

the word "fun" is of course open to interpretation. personally, getting up and doing a 1km walk at 8am on a Sunday is not usually what i would think of when asked to "define fun", but that's what we did. actually, it was a jolly nice stroll indeed.

such was the high level of focus i had on the actual walk part of it that i was unable, alas, to break off thoughts of being the ball and take pictures. i did, you may be pleased to know, manage to take pictures of the rest of the day.

those of you paying attention to the fabric woven by my words here will be fully aware that it was more than just the four of us who went along, something shown off for a start in this most excellent picture.




in the above James and William are flanking James' good friend Kyle. as the two go to different schools they are always looking for ways to get together and play, and what better means than this?

the two even took the time to stop running around for a while and have something to eat!




with the vast expanses of school fields before him it might well go without saying that William went on something of a rampage, perpetually wishing to run here, there and everywhere!




some of the others who went with us on Sunday can be seen in the above picture. at the side there is Cobain, a very good friend of Dylan (who will feature later). it is interesting that Cobain's parents were big enough fans of Nirvana to name their child after a member, but then selected only the 3rd most talented member of that band to use the name of. go figure.

otherwise, walking next to Michele that is indeed my dear, beloved mother-in-law Monica. she kindly came along to join us, even though she had some rather painful swollen feet. you can imagine how the idea of my mother-in-law being in pain and agony torments me.

moving on, and how about some more eating before we get to the running and jumping? whereas i enjoyed a rather fine chicken burger and a most splendid wors roll, the boys were thrilled to discover just how many sweets were on sale!




no, they perhaps should not have been eating sweets, sour glow worms or otherwise, so early on a Sunday. they had, however, been rather good and had done the whole walk, so why not indulge in a treat?

right, time for the true "fun". the school had set up quite a few things for entertainment, massive inflatable climbing things in particular. whereas there were a few of them meant for children of William's age and height, he was having none of them and insisted on going on the ones meant for the somewhat bigger boys.

this, of course, meant that Daddy needed to be on hand to give him a hand in getting to the top of them!




the hat that i am wearing is a genuine made in China one, bought at the impromptu flea market at the school as i had no idea where my usual one was. i think it looks rather stylish, and it could well find its way to the much anticipated gig by The Stone Roses later this year. that blue shirt too, now that i think of it.

William did so much running and jumping that it is beyond me to explain or understand how he didn't eventually just crash from being tired and sleep at some point. he just kept going and going!




that above picture has come out somewhat decent, which is a surprise since that's one of the ones here taken on my blueberry thing. go figure, it can take proper pictures when it feels like it!

onwards, then, and here are James and William contemplating which fun thing to do next!




earlier on i did promise that Dylan would feature here, and here he does, in the most spectacular of circumstances if i say so myself!




that's one of them "bucking bronco" bull ride things he is on. i was due to go on it myself, with the hope of me being thrown off it would serve as a sort of early birthday present for my dear mother-in-law. the ride, alas, attracted a lengthy queue and seemed to be a bit too slow to throw me off, so i gave it a miss. Dylan did very well on it, though!

back to climbing, and here is a most excellent picture of James, Kyle and William!




in those hats and striking that pose it looks very much like the boys are attempting to recreate the classic video for Move Any Mountain by The Shamen, or possibly one of the many ace videos by The Stone Roses or Ocean Colour Scene.

if i remember correctly Michele gets the credit for the next, high quality class action image!




wow! whether that was deliberate or a total fluke chance, what a great image of James showing how excellent he can jump off that inflatable thing!

the fun day ended around lunch day, but the boys remained full of energy. as Michele was somewhat exhausted, i took it upon myself to whisk the boys off to South Fork for a bit, in the hope that Michele could rest a bit and the boys might burn off some of the excess energy.

Grandad, as you may well expect, had a rather interest and somewhat unusual means of helping the boys reduce their energy levels.




yes, you are seeing right - that is Grandad feeding James and William as many Cadbury Creme Eggs as they can carry. Creme Eggs are, other than being tasty, known for being loaded with about as much sugar as you would find in an Alabama sugar plantation. at peak season, too. it may be no surprise, then, for you to learn that they didn't get as tired out at South Fork as i had hoped!

i trust that whatever you did last Sunday was just as excellent and fun!


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Burt Reynolds on a bearskin rug

hi there

for some reason a post i made about 3 years ago featuring Tom Jones in a telephone box has been a rather popular post to visit of late. i have absolutely no idea why, but out of sheer curiosity i am wondering if the same kind of random image would attact even more visitors to this humble blog of mine.

here, then, is the legend, Burt Reynolds, he who should have bagged an Oscar for his epic work in Boogie Nights, posing on a bearskin rug. well, i think it is a bear. or was, rather.




i believe this originally appeared in Cosmopolitan magazine back in the 70s. which tells you just how excellent that decade must have been.

for those who have sought this picture and found it here, you are welcome. for those visiting this site and would rather have not seen this, apologies.


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Thing (2011)

hi there

i am, believe it or not, having a go at trying to catch up on the many films i wish to see but have not found the time for. it isn't going too well thus far this year, it has to be said (two films and we are into the third month), but the intent is there. in my defence, i keep finding things like Scarface, The Godfather and in particular the silence of the lambs come up on TV when i turn it on, and thus i am not particularly inclined to switch them off.

this weekend it was the turn of The Thing, since i think the only other things on were the tedious Back To The Future II and some sort of comedy about a family reunion that looked like it was an awful lot of shouting.

as is usually the case with any sort of remake, sequel or prequel to a "cult classic", the new version of The Thing was derided and shouted down before they had even begun making it by the usual suspects - that small in number but very loud on the internet group called "fanboys" who, for some reason, have got it into their heads that they have a divine right to call the shots on what may or may not happen with certain precious titles. i try to have a look at the least, although as regulars will recall i wanted nothing at all to do with the horrid looking film version of Brideshead Revisited.

the short review is that, much like last years' excellent Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes, very lazy critics and overzealous fanboys have it all wrong - this film called The Thing is excellent and well worth seeing, so long as you can put up with graphic violence and the idea of being terrified.

the above will all be expanded upon after the poster for the film, but as usual be warned, for there is a *** MASSIVE SPOILER WARNING *** in place for the rest of this post.




one thing that people were not at all sure of about this new version was if it was a sequel, a prequel or a remake. the truth is, well, it serves as all three. elements of the start of the film suggest it's a sequel, aspects of the body of the film feel like a very good remake and then the end implies it is in fact a prequel. very much like the only other film i can think of which did this trick, Evil Dead II, it somehow works and delivers an excellent film whether you liked or even saw the original.

the premise, if you wish it, after the opening sees a young but apparently gifted science student called Kate Lloyd being whisked off to Antarctica by the incredibly arrogant Dr. Sander Halvorson to investigate "something". what that something is turns out to be what looks like a crashed (but very well preserved) alien craft and, a little distance from it trapped in ice, the presumed pilot of the craft.




the "thing" trapped in the ice is taken back to a Norwegian base camp and, surprise surprise, manages to escape the block of ice it was trapped in. whatever the thing is, it has two characteristics - it can merge and mimic other living organisms (humans being a speciality) and it is really, really unfriendly.





those familiar with the original hardly need me to tell you the rest, but for those who don't know what follows is a brilliant exercise in terror and paranoia. with an ability to mimic humans, the survivors are trapped in fear of the thing lurking outside but are also aware it could be hiding with them, taking the shape of one of their colleagues.

fans of the original (itself a remake, by the way) will always be ready to tell you that the film was famous for having an all male cast. this one differs somewhat, with the main character being a lady in the shape of the superb Mary Elizabeth Winstead. it is handy that she is superb, as the preposterous premise (a student would really be asked to go on a mystery mission involving aliens? and they would agree without knowing?) is pulled off convincingly enough thanks to her.

another reason for it being handy is how it borrows on an idea from the 80s version if the John Carpenter version of The Thing borrowed rather heavily from Ridley Scott's Alien, with Kurt Russell in the "accepting doom" role of Tom Skerrit, then the Matthijs van Heijningen Jr. version of The Thing owes more than a passing nod to Aliens with Kate Lloyd being very much the Ellen Ripley of the piece.




the rest of the cast do the job asked of them, and very well indeed. it certainly was a nice touch having those playing the Norwegians sing a "classic" 80s Eurovision Song Contest entry from Norway.

something that left me very impressed indeed was that for the most part the film used actual, proper special effects and props, with only the bare minimum of the dreaded CGI used to give subtle touch ups. you can tell that this is a film crafted by film lovers who wished to make the implausible feel real, and my word they succeeded.

as suggested at the start, this film is scary. and i do mean scary. the list of films that casued me genuine fear is limited to An American Werewolf In London, the silence of the lambs and The Descent, with an honourable mention for the infamous "sloth" scene in Se7en. this film came pretty close to joining the list. it's strange - as familiar as i am with the John Carpenter version and as much as i anticipated one or two things in this version, the film made me jump and shake at least three times. bravo.




i presume the message that i really enjoyed this film has come across loud and clear from my comments thus far. it really was excellent viewing, and i would not hesitate in encouraging even the most obnoxious of "1982 version" purists from giving it a try.

for those precious, special types out there that are berating the idea of someone touching the John Carpenter "original", do bear this in mind - one of the most enthusiastic supporters of the making of this film was John Carpenter. he even went as far as trying to sneak over to the set and make a cameo appearance, but his schedule would not allow it. this particular group of lazy critics and misguided fanboys should, then, get off their high horse and just enjoy what really is an amazing work of film.




the 2011 version of The Thing is not an attempt to better or improve the 1982 version. it's an honest attempt by people who clearly loved that film to enhance and expand on what we loved of it and make a damned good film in its own right. to that extent, it is a huge success, and well worth seeking out.

as for what film i shall catch up with and when, i have no idea at the moment! a rather nasty eye infection is probably going to make it tricky to watch anything for a few days, anyway!


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Monday, March 12, 2012

fish and chips from Ray Gray

hi there

it is with some pride that i mention my Uncle Trevor has become quite the keeper of history of the village we both forever refer to as home, Great Ayton. he has solicited and gathered numerous pictures of the place over the year, and shared them over on the grand social network.

not everyone, however, is a participant of the grand social network. the more paranoid members of society in particular wish to have nothing to do with it, believing it to be some sort of CIA inspired or led data obtaining scheme or other such rubbish. this being the case, some recent pictures put there are too good to leave to only those who registered to see it, and thus i felt a need to share them here too.

behold, if you will, the inside of Ray Gray's fish and chip shop!




wow, the memories that come flooding back! not only from seeing those two again, but also for seeing those one or two things in the picture that i recall from childhood - the 'Karate' sign in particular, it has to be said! i cannot spot it, but there was as i remember a "dancing monkey" on the shelf too, or one of those toy monkeys with cymbals, a little like the infamous one out of the film Euro Trip.

my regular order from there would have been a bag or two of chips and, of course, scraps, assuming there were some by the time i got there. those of you who have no idea what scraps are clearly have not visited a proper chippy, i suggest you search and seek out this fine food!

over on the social network, Uncle Trevor has spoken of his enthusiasm for battered sausage from there after doing his selfless duty of being social down in The Buck, a fine pub around the corner and down the road from Ray Gray's. i must confess to have never trying this, i shall then not quibble with Trevor's view that it was the best sausage he ever nibbled on.

and how i fondly recall getting their. it was either a walk across the Beck on the footbridge down on Low Green from Grandma and Grandad, or a bike ride down from Scotta House if staying up at Gran and Gramps. it was an exceptionally popular place; the queue was often a "snake" of two rows and then out the door of a very narrow corridor. so narrow, as i remember, that i doubt someone of my size could now stand two deep in it!




i thank kindly the relative of Ray who provided the above two pictures.

the above of course has, sadly, all gone now. in either 1990 or 1991, after many years of loyally serving the village, enough was enough for Ray, and he took to a life of much deserved and much earned retirement. i do recall bombing down on my bike to buy my last ever bag of chips from Mr Gray, i believe i got an order for me and Gramps whilst Gran was off at darts.

the chippie under the new ownership was, as is so often the case, a disaster. the prices double and the portions shrank, and the food just did not taste as good as the world had come to expect. i only went the once, so i have no idea when the new owner eventually closed down. i cannot imagine he was around for too long.

thanks to the magic of that google earth street view thing, i can see how the street where Ray Gray's once proudly stood, and it seems that it currently has no one serving anyone a thing.




that does make me a touch sad, really. that's another part of my life wiped off the surface. oh well, you can never go back, but that should not stop one from, every now and then, looking back.

it would be my most sincere and earnest hope that anyone reading this page in isolation from the rest of my blog is doing so because they had an out of the blue fond memory of Ray Gray's and simply stumbled or googled upon it. if you are such a reader, please then know that you are not alone.


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thursday, March 08, 2012

Project Lifeblood : 2 - 6 April 2012

hi there

well, this is an appeal i started somewhat by accident on a whim, but i am going to go through with it. it may well be a spectacular failure, although it is hardly the most ambitious of plans. bear with me, all will make sense.

Lifeblood is the 7th studio album from the Manic Street Preachers. released in 2004, it features two singles that got to number two in the charts - The Love Of Richard Nixon and Empty Souls. the opening track, 1985, is considered by many (myself very much included) as being one of their greatest songs, and a big missed opportunity for a genuine smash hit single.




it came out to positive reviews and was overwhelmingly regarded from a critical perspective as a triumph and great success by the band.




the sales, alas, did not match the critical acclaim, and the album did not do at all well in regards of the chart, spending only two weeks inside the top 75.

it is the case that, sadly, pretty much only because it did not sell well that the band have more or less rejected the album, with Nicky Wire in particular being rather vocal in dismissing it.

Project Lifeblood intends to try and stop this nonsense. if we, 8 years after the release, can buy enough copies to get it inside the top 200 albums, then it may well blip on the radars of one or two people and hopefully the band may notice.

i don't suggest an attempt to make it number one or sell millions. the awful, awful Ringo 2012 managed to sell 700 copies in a week and got to about 180. if we can get that, then i would consider that a success.

if you wish to join in, either to own or re-own a great album or even just to do it to annoy Nicky Wire, then thank you. you would need to buy the album during the week of April 2 - 6 2012, and furthermore purchase it from a place that contributes sales figures to the charts.

if you live in the UK and want an mp3 copy of it then it can be purchased from amazon digital. sorry, i cannot access the iTunes site but buying it from there would count to the charts.

UPDATE link to purchase from iTunes. thanks Porco!

for those who prefer a CD of it, and indeed anyone outside of the UK who wants to join in this is the only option, the links to chart counting stores are : amazon, Townsend Records and HMV. none of the stores seem to be charging much over £5 for it (excluding international shipping, all offer free UK shipping).

i know the world has been inundated with "let's buy this record instead of a Simon Cowell one" ever since the success of Rage Against The Machine, but this honestly is not such a thing. i'm just trying to get some much needed recognition for a sadly ignored album.

if you join in, or at least share this link and the details with others, i thank you greatly and really hope you enjoy discovering or rediscovering this classic album.


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

the lost footage of Stanley Kubrick

hi there


up front, please note that the title says "footage" and not "films". there shall be no discussion here of the likes of Fear & Desire, AI, The Aryan Papers, Napoleon, Perfume or even his, it is claimed, faked moon landing footage. this is instead about footage, indeed mostly completed scenes, cut by Kubrick from his films and, in all likelihood, footage that the world shall never get to see.

as of now, the only deleted scene from a Stanley Kubrick film to ever officially see light of day was the infamous "snails and oysters" sequence from Spartacus. this was cut to appease the moral censors at the time of release and was restored by Kubrick himself in the early 1990s, apparently done only because he discovered the audio intended for the scene could be recreated thanks to Anthony Hopkins being able to do a note perfect impression of the late Laurence Olivier. beyond that, it is in all likelihood the case that we have seen even more footage of his films than Kubrick ever intended, for if one follows the pattern of his constant editing (tinkering, if you will) then it stands to reason that the final cut he delivered of Eyes Wide Shut would have been given further edits before it went on general release.

be warned, for if you have for some reason you have not seen the complete works of Stanley Kubrick (shame on you), there are going to be *** SIGNIFICANT SPOILERS AHEAD ***

in regards of footage cut and gone forever, perhaps the most famous footage from Kubrick remains the "pie fight" seqeuence from Dr Strangelove, Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Bomb. the world at least has some high quality still images of this, with the pictures being available on most DVD releases of the film.

the conclusion of the film was intended as a huge pie fight in the war room (that which gentlemen may not fight in), presumably intended as a symbolic gesture of the total destruction brought about by nuclear conflict, accidental or deliberate.




the images all show that the scene was filmed, but was discarded by Kubrick in favour of the "We'll Meet Again" and "I Can Walk" finale. this was, not that i am in any way in a position to cast criticism over the greatest film director of all time, an exceptionally wise move. no matter what symbolic gesture Kubrick imagined of the pie fight it would have looked like a pie fight and thus turned the film from a brilliant, dark satire into a slapstick comedy affair.




the pie fight footage was something that all were aware of for years before DVD and the very internet you currently use reported on it, and one cannot but help wonder if a certain Alan Parker was very much aware of it when he chose guns that fired rather similar pies as weapons for his musical Bugsy Malone.

discussing deleted footage from The Shining becomes an interesting affair, for there exists a number of different cuts of the film anyway. of the versions out there, the two "main" variants would the the USA DVD and the "rest of the world" DVD, with the American release running some 40 minutes longer. beyond that, though, practically every video and laserdisc release of the film has featured subtle differences in the cut.

what has not been seen since the initial, strictly limited release of the film in 1980, though, is the original ending. now, you people saw the big spoiler warning above, yeah?

the film as it is known now ends with Jack Torrence frozen to death in the grounds of the Overlook, followed by an ambiguous cut to a photograph that shows he has been frozen in time for all time. what is less well known is that another scene was filmed to go on the end of that part.

the scene takes place a short while after Wendy and Danny have been rescued from the carnage of the Overlook and finds them recovering in an unspecified hospital.




the exact details of the scene are somewhat sketchy, but the crux of it seems to be that a detective who has investigated the case is visiting Danny and Wendy to inform them that they have found "no evidence" of the supernatural incidents that they, you have to assume, had claimed they had been the victim of, and thus the case is being closed with the view that it was, for want of a better word, "simply" the case that Jack Torrence had gone insane due to cabin fever.

the shot of Shelley Duvall from this sequence suggests that she received this news with some disbelief.




i would suspect that there was to be some sort of other twist too, perhaps along the lines of Danny evoking the gift of "the shining" as a last shot, but there's nothing documented beyond what i have already said. if the scene was to only play out as described, then it is little wonder it got axed (if you will excuse the phrase), for all it would have done would be to possibly undermine all that had happened before it.

on any version of the DVD of The Shining you will get a "blink and you will miss" clue to another scene, too. in the superb "Making The Shining" documentary, there is a brief but clear shot of a decapitated female head. i've no idea where that was supposed to slot in with regards to The Shining, but the idea of a decapitated female head seems to have really, really excited Kubrick, as one was also the focus point of a notorious deleted scene from Full Metal Jacket.

very little of Full Metal Jacket is not horrifying, if we are honest, but the brutal conclusion of the "sniper" finale does tend to linger in the mind of the viewer. the simplistic, suggested horror of the moment that Pvt Joker kills the sniper was intended to be a good deal more graphic. if the film had been presented as originally intended, audiences would have seen the vicious creation that was Animal Mother (Adam Baldwin) decapitate the corpse of the sniper and use her head as some sort of football.




i say "intended" rather than "filmed" as there is some debate as to whether or not the scene was ever shot that way. for every person who says "i was there, it was filmed", another comes along and says "i was there, it was discussed but never actually filmed". we shall, presumably, never get to know the truth.

other footage known to exist from Full Metal Jacket would be the auditions for the film. Kubrick relied 100% on videotape submissions for casting, and did not meet a single actor for an audition. it would be fascinating to know of those videos still existed, if only to see which other actors tried out for the film.

in respect of the single most notorious, infamous film that Stanley Kubrick made, it is of course well known that he based his film on the edited 20 chapter version of the novel A Clockwork Orange rather than the full 21 chapter edition. what is somewhat less well known is that Kubrick filmed all 20 chapters that he was aware of, even if all of the sequences did not make it into the finished film.

the most famous such scene, and the only one we really have a tantalizing glimpse of, would have come early on in Alex and his droogs wanton celebration of ultra-violence, it being when they attacked a professor leaving a library.




for those unfamiliar with the novel, the scene involves Alex, Georgie, Pete and Dim harass a professor, destroy his books and beat him up. later in the novel the professor, as is the case with nearly all of Alex's victims, a chance meeting after the Ludovico technique renders Alex incapable of violence allows the professor to extract revenge.




why this sequence was dropped is open to debate. in all likelihood, i would imagine it was a case of the sequence being far too similar to the assault on the drunken tramp and thus was removed for the sake of running time. there is also the fact that, and this would be a flaw in the film as much as it is one of the few flaws in the novel, the idea of Alex engaging in the wanton destruction of books does not tie in at all well with the fact that his love and vast knowledge of classical music is used as a sign of a superior intelligence being at work in the character. loving classical music but hating classical texts? doesn't sound right.

a somewhat cheekier urban legend suggests that Kurbick might have "forgotten" to film the scene where the professor gets revenge later in the film, and thus dropped the initial attack for the sake of symmetry. yeah, OK, if you want to believe that one then fine, but the idea of Kubrick "forgetting" to film something does not really add up when one considers the meticulous way he made movies.




the images from this scene in A Clockwork Orange were originally displayed on the now apparently defunct malcolmmcdowell.net website. i am sorry i cannot give exact and full credit, but i am led to believe these pictures were given over by Malcolm McDowell himself.

finally, the lost footage that there remains an outside chance of the world one day seeing. in 2010, Douglass Trumbull revealed that he had in his possession 17 minutes of unseen footage from the film 2001 A Space Odyssey.

and that is all he has said on the subject. so, in regards of what the 17 minutes may contain.....




....no one has a clue. it could be anything from a mindblowing expanded sequence from the conclusion of the film, or it could be 17 minutes of alternate footage of the space hotel orbiting around Earth. Trumbull was involved with the special effects, so my thoughts are that he has no significant to the plot footage, instead probably scenes related to the (dazzling, in particular for the time) special effects.

the truly exciting thing about the 17 minutes of footage is, if we are to believe what Mr Trumbull claims, that it exists. chances of the world at large seeing it are limited, but at least in this case there is a chance.

the "problem" with footage that Kubrick removed is that he didn't file it away for later use - he personally oversaw the destruction of any and all footage that he did not use in his films. the famous restored sequence from Spartacus was spared presumably only as Kubrick did not have total control over that film; he was rather just the "hired director". on a similar note, there is some that would have you believe that Kubrick footage not used by Kubrick is out there in the world. rumours persist that Kubrick filmed parts of The Empire Strikes Back at the same time he made The Shining, and there are those that claim the Brando film One-Eyed Jacks does indeed feature scenes shot by Kubrick before Marlon Brando fired him and took over directing himself. both of these claims are disputed by the producers of the movies, and i leave you to make up your own mind as to whether or not Kubrick created the fake footage of the Moon landings.

on the one side, it is terribly frustrating that rubbish made by the likes of Uwe Boll, McG, Paul WS Anderson and the particularly apparently talentless Eli Roth (whose career seems based on the fact that he is mates with Quentin Tarantino) get super deluxe DVD releases showing "insights" into how they make the rubbish they do, yet when it comes to the master we have next to no footage or unused material to learn from or gain insights. that said, on the other side there is the fact that the artist himself removed and destroyed the footage, and thus perhaps we should respect his wishes and not concern ourselves with that which we have not seen, for he felt it was not worth seeing.

despite hints at film reels in documentaries such as Stanley Kubrick's Boxes, the statement from Kubrick's family is "we have no unreleased footage from any of Stanley's films and if we ever found any we would neither release it nor allow anyone to see it.". that would seem to be pretty much the final word on any quest to find lost footage, but all the same it, at least for me, is interesting to get hints of what footage Kubrick discarded, wonder why he got rid of it and ponder what it may have looked like.


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Monday, March 05, 2012

old friends return

hi there

every now and then you get a most peculiar thing happening in the world of music. that would be a well established singer leaving the band, the band deciding to carry on with a new singer and somehow, despite assumptions that it would not work, it works out rather well. well in the sense that the band continues, at the least, if not with the success once experienced.

Marillion are a rather fine example of this. lead singer Fish departed at pretty much the height of their fame (they were after all huge with the singles Kayleigh and Lavendar), fearing that the success and constant touring were wiping him out and certainly turning him towards alcoholic oblivion. the band carried on and have done rather well since, as indeed has Fish in his own right. the fact that the band and the singer remain on speaking terms, indeed even performing together every now and then, makes that a winner of a story.

the same is not quite true of The Stranglers, but pretty close. Hugh Cornwell left in 1990, claiming that he believed the group had "run its course" and were creatively exhausted. well, the last album he recorded with the band, 10, certainly suggests that as it is the weakest the band ever produced. Dave Greenfield, JJ Burnel and the legendary Jet Black did not have quite the same view, however, and have been getting on with it, with different singer and guitarist combinations, for the 22 years since Hugh left.

and it seems unlikely they are going to stop any time soon, what with the release of their 17th studio album today, Giants.




nice one, men in black! i am looking forward to hearing this one as and when it lands.

there exists, of course, a pocket of fans that refuse to have anything to do with The Stranglers sans Hugh. this is their loss, really, and they have missed out on some great music in the last two decades - About Time in particular being a great album. the hits and the scandalous stories may not be as much of an ever present for the band these days, but in general, the saying once a Stranglers fan always a Stranglers fan comes to mind here, and i have no doubt that this new album will find a substantial audience with their devout fanbase.

at the moment i'm busy in the car with a mix of The Style Council, Depeche Mode and Adam & The Ants. i think, however, it could well be time to listen to a few of the previous albums from The Stranglers whilst i await the arrival of this one.


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sunday means South Fork

hi there

well, as summer seems to be in its last throes here, with an ever cooler breeze growing stronger on an afternoon, what better way to enjoy the heat and the sun than to take a turn past the magic of South Fork? my dear friend Mike was, as those following this site will be aware, staying there overnight, making it a very good idea indeed to pay a visit.

indeed i did is the answer to those of you asking "did you take a proper camera with you, though". the blueberry thing serves me fine for ad hoc incidents, but it is always better to have a proper camera for proper pictures. well, as proper as Sony can make one.

James very kindly took some time out from playing Lego Star Wars on his PSP thingie, and indeed took a break from checking out the excellent Lego Star Wars watch that Mike had brought him to pose long enough for a quick picture.




that's not bad work at all, since he was at a crucial stage of smashing something or other up in the Star Wars universe!

William, alas, was feeling very much under the weather yesterday. he does tend, however, to simply shrug off any and all illness if it gets in the way of him running around playing. this would not be the greatest picture ever taken of him, but it is not the worst and a good deal better than nothing!




i am happy to say that it was clearly one of those "one off" 24 hour bug things that was bothering William, or maybe just something that he had eaten, as this morning he was rather chipper and pretty much back to his usual self!

back to South Fork and, of course, news of the happy chap that lives there, my Dad. he had of course taken upon himself to welcome Mike and help him relax after his flight in his usual way, which of course involved getting Mike to assist him hammer some random planks of wood onto a door and indeed invite him to assist with a spot of plumbing on the roof. Mike declined the latter offer, somewhat wisely.

we did take the liberty of warning Mike in advance that my Dad has developed one or two curious hobbies of late, the most baffling one of those being "dogging" or at the least his interpretation of it. as it turns out, the phrase "dogging" has not yet entered the standard vocabulary of Australia, but Mike soon clocked what it actually involved. Dad, somewhat thankfully, believes that it means as you can see something different all together!




as for Mike himself, well, it has been superb to see him and catch up as you can imagine, but the lad is rather worn out from a good deal of time in the skies and in different time zones. this did not, of course, stop us having a great time, in particular going for a swim.

now, for some reason my Mum thought it would be excellent to get a picture of the two of us doing handstands in the pool. gone are the days when Mike and i would bike to Berwick Hills or Stokesly baths and still be fit enough for such stunts (well, for me anyway), but we had a good crack at it.

after one or two pictures that didn't quite show it off, this one turned up, which if i say so myself looks rather smart!




for some reason my legs have been getting some rather complimentary words on the grand social network, which leads me to believe they are probably looking at Mike and thinking it is me. for a guide as to which legs belong to who, here is one of us the more conventional way around in the pool!




all of that, and we got to watch those two lesser teams from the North East, Newcastle and Sunderland, play too!

i would imagine, then, between excellent KFC, the Gautrain, seeing Mike again, swimming and watching football, that it goes without saying that we had a very excellent weekend indeed. i can only hope and trust you all did too!


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saturday, March 03, 2012

the day i caught the train

hi there

well, today was a little different from a usual Saturday for me. partially because i ended up going shopping twice, slightly because Boro won, but mostly because the day saw me take the train to the airport.

i had reason to be at the airport today, so decided that it would be best to take this much vaunted, expensive to build and seemingly but not really expensive to ride Gautrain along. well, the roads are a nightmare to the airport at the moment with all the road works.

i thus duly got myself to the Sandton station, and decided for the benefit of anyone interested to take a picture of one of the escalators to the station.




the platform for the airport is down five or six of these, which is probably quite exciting for escalator enthusiasts and almost certainly why the security guard advised me to rather take the elevator.

via the magic of blueberry phone messaging stuff i was able to send this picture to Michele. James was slightly interested in this, but asked if i could send a picture from the train too. i'm not the most photogenic, i have little in the way of skill in taking a self portrait and the blueberry camera is not the best or most flattering thing on earth, but i was happy to have a go at this request.




as it turns out, though, i was "silly" to send the above picture. James wanted a picture of the actual train, not one of me sat on it. well, the platform was rather busy, and i always feel somewhat suspect trying to take random pictures in the presence of rather tastily armed security staff, but i took one that James was considerably more impressed with.




i have to say, from my first experience, the Gautrain is magnificent, and i cannot wait to ride on it again. The price of the ride, currently R105 to the airport and that much again back, is truly insignificant compared to the benefits - no battling the roads and traffic, no parking issue and no parking charges. it takes about 12 minutes to get there too. ace!

now, for what reason was i at the airport today? Dad had told me that, as you get out of the train and go down some more escalators, there is an absolutely massive KFC there. this, as most things a father tells a son i suppose, is quite correct. it is excellent. the KFC there has an image of The Colonel almost as big as the average house.

i know you want to know what i had there. well, i can do better than that and show you. and indeed tell you - a streetwise two and a snack burger.




sorry that picture isn't the greatest. i was concentrating a bit too much on some random tourist who grabbed the first black chap walking past and asked him for some pronunciation advice for certain words in his Zulu phrasebook. it was rather optimistic of him to assume that he would speak Zulu (we have a dozen languages here, please note America), and interesting that the words he was struggling with were all offensive slurs, ones that i am not inclined to repeat here.

oh, yeah, nearly forgot. other than the KFC, the reason for my visit to the airport was to pick up my good, longstanding friend Mike, who i have known since, what, 1983 and have not seen for several years!




he is over here on "business" as usual, but this did not stop us enjoying a pint and a curry as we watched some football highlights and discussed several things, hotel porters in Felixstowe in particular. his fatigue from such a long flight did, however, stop us, but we shall no doubt resume tomorrow.

erm, i have somewhat rashly posted this pic up over on the grand social network, with the comment that it is us celebrating our 29th anniversary. this, it seems, might have led one or two to assume our relationship is a good deal more involved than it actually is. although we have in fairness slept together a good many times over the years - a few times in various locales around Europe, but mostly in his bedroom at his Mum & Dad's when we were kids as they always let us stay up late to watch old Hammer Horror films on a portable black and white TV. well, I watched them, Mike normally fell asleep after a good, long, hard go at some sort of game on the VIC-20 or similar. beyond that, other than an incident where Mike had to hold me up in a shower and feed me headache tablets a couple of hours after an ill-advised drinking binge in Felixstowe and a couple of hours before a wedding, not much else to confess to, sorry!

no doubt Dad will take a few more "proper" pictures which i shall try and put here of the two of us. there is no doubt because he told me that he would be doing this.

hope you've all had an interesting and indeed good Saturday!


be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!