honestly, if asked, i would not have thought there would be too much interest (if any, look you see) in what toilet paper i happen to use. why, if nothing else of the subject, would anyone care? yet there appears to be some interest, what with this post and then this post from last year (2025) getting a greater number than one person reading them, so go figure.
for those who simply cannot be bothered to click on either of those links yet for some reason have an interest in this subject, well. a brief, sort of (but not actual) executive summary sort of thing would be that after many years of using andrex toilet paper i elected, on a whim (and inspired by a decent discount), to give the cushelle variant a try. but now, as the title of this posts suggests, i have reverted to andrex.
note the correct use of a variation of the word "revert" there. yes, another of my moans and groans i am afraid. anyone - and i mean anyone - who says (or writes) revert and then applies the word "back" directly after it is simply trying to show off, using a word they do not understand, and quite clearly want a punch in the face. i am getting quite fed up of (supposedly) professional broadcasters, even the predominantly thick ones from Bolton, do precisely this. they should be dismissed and removed from any sort of broadcasting so as not to pollute any further minds.
so, why back to andrex? i happened to need to get some more toilet paper in and noticed this particular pack on sale. from a costing perspective, since i can't recall the provenance, it was £3.99 for 9 rolls, which with the help of a calculator comes in at around 44p a roll. this struck me as a reasonable cost, especially when considering all the benefits or bonuses on offer.
it isn't really my place to tell a massive toilet paper making company how it is, yet all the same it strikes me as rather disingenuous to call one specific type of their products "complete clean". oh yes, presently the world is littered with people using the term "disingenuous" incorrectly, but as mostly it is done by provincial politicians it is not worth going off on one about as few ("less") listen to them anyway. getting (somewhat) back to the point, is it not so that andrex calling this type of toilet paper "complete clean" means that their other types do not do a complete clean, as it were? who is it that they think are only interested in toilet paper that does a partial clean?
does the "unique 3D wave texture" (credit for a correct use of the word unique) make any difference? not really. i mean, no, i have not gone and done a comparison between andrex and cushelle, or for that matter between different andrex types. should it be of interest, yes, this toilet paper is doing all that i would wish it to in a satisfactory way.
can't make any promises, but yes, i can certainly try to make future posts more interesting.
be excellent to each other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment